The case involves an application filed by Mr. Viral Rajarshi Mehta, an Operational Creditor, against M/s. Neptune Ventures and Developers Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, r.w. Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The Operational Creditor claimed a default amount of ₹1,16,41,500/- for professional services rendered to the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor argued that the amount was in dispute as the agreement was contingent upon the successful completion of a project with Tata Housing Development Corporation Limited (THDCL), which did not materialize.
Mr. Viral Rajarshi Mehta, an Operational Creditor, provided development consultancy and investment advisory services to M/s. Neptune Ventures and Developers Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor sought the Operational Creditor's services to facilitate a partnership with Tata Housing Development Corporation Limited (THDCL) for a project. The Operational Creditor performed various duties, including generating interest from THDCL, negotiating terms, ensuring closure of term sheets, and creating business plans. The Operational Creditor raised three invoices for his services, but the Corporate Debtor failed to make any payments. The Operational Creditor issued a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after which he
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Debtor was in need of a Development…
The Operational Creditor received a positive…
The case involves an application filed by Mr. Viral Rajarshi Mehta, an Operational Creditor, against M/s. Neptune Ventures and Developers Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, r.w. Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The Operational Creditor claimed a default amount of ₹1,16,41,500/- for professional services rendered to the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor argued that the amount was in dispute as the agreement was contingent upon the successful completion of a project with Tata Housing Development Corporation Limited (THDCL), which did not materialize.
Mr. Viral Rajarshi Mehta, an Operational Creditor, provided development consultancy and investment advisory services to M/s. Neptune Ventures and Developers Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor sought the Operational Creditor's services to facilitate a partnership with Tata Housing Development Corporation Limited (THDCL) for a project. The Operational Creditor performed various duties, including generating interest from THDCL, negotiating terms, ensuring closure of term sheets, and creating business plans. The Operational Creditor raised three invoices for his services, but the Corporate Debtor failed to make any payments. The Operational Creditor issued a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after which he
…The Debtor was in need of a Development…
The Operational Creditor received a positive…