The case pertains to an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench. The order sheet reflects the hearing held on February 1, 2021. The matter involves M/s Progressive Steel Partnership Firm as the petitioner and Mr. Anil Rai as the respondent. The court convened through video conference.
The case involves M/s Progressive Steel Partnership Firm as the petitioner and Mr. Anil Rai as the respondent. The hearing was held on February 1, 2021, via video conference. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Sagar Sheth a/w Ms. Nikita Hinger, sought to withdraw the application with the liberty to file a fresh application. There was no representation from the respondent. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed, based on the petitioner's request. The relevance of these facts lies in the petitioner's decision to withdraw the application, leading to its dismissal without a full hearing on the merits.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order sheet of the…
The case pertains to an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench. The order sheet reflects the hearing held on February 1, 2021. The matter involves M/s Progressive Steel Partnership Firm as the petitioner and Mr. Anil Rai as the respondent. The court convened through video conference.
The case involves M/s Progressive Steel Partnership Firm as the petitioner and Mr. Anil Rai as the respondent. The hearing was held on February 1, 2021, via video conference. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Sagar Sheth a/w Ms. Nikita Hinger, sought to withdraw the application with the liberty to file a fresh application. There was no representation from the respondent. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed, based on the petitioner's request. The relevance of these facts lies in the petitioner's decision to withdraw the application, leading to its dismissal without a full hearing on the merits.
Order sheet of the…