The case involves a petition against Macro Cast Pvt Ltd. An earlier order dated 13.12.2019 in CP (IB) No. 165/9/AMR/2019 against the same Corporate Debtor had already admitted a petition and ordered the initiation of CIRP of the Respondent.
The key facts are as follows: A petition was filed against Macro Cast Pvt Ltd. An order dated 13.12.2019 in CP (IB) No. 165/9/AMR/2019 had already admitted a petition against the same Corporate Debtor and initiated CIRP. The present case is related to the same Corporate Debtor. The petitioner is now directed to approach the IRP appointed in the earlier CIRP proceedings. The relevance of these facts lies in the context of ongoing CIRP proceedings and the need to avoid redundant actions.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing he…
Order dated 13.12.2019 in CP (IB) No.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a petition against Macro Cast Pvt Ltd. An earlier order dated 13.12.2019 in CP (IB) No. 165/9/AMR/2019 against the same Corporate Debtor had already admitted a petition and ordered the initiation of CIRP of the Respondent.
The key facts are as follows: A petition was filed against Macro Cast Pvt Ltd. An order dated 13.12.2019 in CP (IB) No. 165/9/AMR/2019 had already admitted a petition against the same Corporate Debtor and initiated CIRP. The present case is related to the same Corporate Debtor. The petitioner is now directed to approach the IRP appointed in the earlier CIRP proceedings. The relevance of these facts lies in the context of ongoing CIRP proceedings and the need to avoid redundant actions.
Hearing he…
Order dated 13.12.2019 in CP (IB) No.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.