The case pertains to an insolvency petition filed under Section 9 of the IBC. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation on their behalf. The petitioner has been absent since March 6, 2019.
The National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, was hearing a case related to M/S TV 18 Broadcast Limited V/s Maharana Infrastructure and Professional Services Limited under Section 9 of the IBC. The petitioner was absent during the hearing on April 30, 2019, and had been absent since March 6, 2019. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The court presumed that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case.
Sign in to view the parties.
The petitioner…
Hearing of the Allahabad Bench of the National…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case pertains to an insolvency petition filed under Section 9 of the IBC. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation on their behalf. The petitioner has been absent since March 6, 2019.
The National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, was hearing a case related to M/S TV 18 Broadcast Limited V/s Maharana Infrastructure and Professional Services Limited under Section 9 of the IBC. The petitioner was absent during the hearing on April 30, 2019, and had been absent since March 6, 2019. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The court presumed that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case.
The petitioner…
Hearing of the Allahabad Bench of the National…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.