The case involves a Company Petition filed under Section 9 of the IBC by MTU Maintenance Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH against LEPL Projects. The Adjudicating Authority initiated CIRP against the Respondent, and an IRP was appointed. The promoter of the respondent appealed the order before the NCLAT. During the appeal hearing, the parties reached a settlement.
MTU Maintenance Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH filed a Company Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against LEPL Projects. The Adjudicating Authority initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against LEPL Projects and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The promoter of LEPL Projects appealed the order before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). During the appeal hearing, the parties reached a settlement. The NCLAT, in view of the settlement, set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and allowed the withdrawal of the application filed under Section 9. The Adjudicating Authority then dismissed the Transfer Petition (TCP) and released LEPL Projects from CIRP. LEPL Projects was directed to reimburse
…Sign in to view the parties.
Adjudicating A…
NCLAT passed an order…
The case involves a Company Petition filed under Section 9 of the IBC by MTU Maintenance Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH against LEPL Projects. The Adjudicating Authority initiated CIRP against the Respondent, and an IRP was appointed. The promoter of the respondent appealed the order before the NCLAT. During the appeal hearing, the parties reached a settlement.
MTU Maintenance Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH filed a Company Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against LEPL Projects. The Adjudicating Authority initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against LEPL Projects and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The promoter of LEPL Projects appealed the order before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). During the appeal hearing, the parties reached a settlement. The NCLAT, in view of the settlement, set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and allowed the withdrawal of the application filed under Section 9. The Adjudicating Authority then dismissed the Transfer Petition (TCP) and released LEPL Projects from CIRP. LEPL Projects was directed to reimburse
…Adjudicating A…
NCLAT passed an order…