The case involves a petition filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Kasata Hometech India Private Limited due to default in payment of financial debt. However, the petitioners and the respondent entered into a settlement agreement, executing Consent Terms dated June 2, 2021.
A petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Kasata Hometech India Private Limited due to a default in financial debt payment. The petitioners and the respondent subsequently entered into a settlement agreement, formalized through Consent Terms dated June 2, 2021. Consequently, the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, citing the settlement agreement as the basis for their request. The relevance of the settlement agreement is that it resolves the financial dispute outside of the CIRP, leading to the request for withdrawal of the insolvency petition.
Sign in to view the parties.
Petitioners and…
The Bench allowed the…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Kasata Hometech India Private Limited due to default in payment of financial debt. However, the petitioners and the respondent entered into a settlement agreement, executing Consent Terms dated June 2, 2021.
A petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Kasata Hometech India Private Limited due to a default in financial debt payment. The petitioners and the respondent subsequently entered into a settlement agreement, formalized through Consent Terms dated June 2, 2021. Consequently, the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, citing the settlement agreement as the basis for their request. The relevance of the settlement agreement is that it resolves the financial dispute outside of the CIRP, leading to the request for withdrawal of the insolvency petition.
Petitioners and…
The Bench allowed the…