The case involves multiple petitions (CP(IBC)/13/KOB/2021 to CP(IBC)/19/KOB/2021) filed by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019. These petitions seek to initiate the Insolvency Resolution Process against personal guarantors of the corporate debtor, M/s. Unitek Power Solutions India Limited. The corporate debtor had availed credit facilities from the Federal Bank Limited and defaulted on its debt obligations, leading to its account being classified as a non-performing asset (NPA). The financial facilities were
…M/s. JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited filed petitions under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against personal guarantors of M/s. Unitek Power Solutions India Limited, the corporate debtor. Unitek Power Solutions India Limited had availed credit facilities from the Federal Bank Limited, including Cash Credit, Bank Guarantee, and Term Loan (IPS). The amount of default was Rs. 38,56,65,007.80 as of 2021-05-31. The corporate debtor failed to meet its debt obligations, leading to its classification as a non-performing asset (NPA). The loans were secured by a charge over properties belonging to the guarantors. The respondents, being the personal guarantors, had undertaken to unconditionally and irrevocably pay the Bank on demand in
…Sign in to view the parties.
Liquidation of the…
Financial assets of…
The case involves multiple petitions (CP(IBC)/13/KOB/2021 to CP(IBC)/19/KOB/2021) filed by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019. These petitions seek to initiate the Insolvency Resolution Process against personal guarantors of the corporate debtor, M/s. Unitek Power Solutions India Limited. The corporate debtor had availed credit facilities from the Federal Bank Limited and defaulted on its debt obligations, leading to its account being classified as a non-performing asset (NPA). The financial facilities were
…M/s. JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited filed petitions under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against personal guarantors of M/s. Unitek Power Solutions India Limited, the corporate debtor. Unitek Power Solutions India Limited had availed credit facilities from the Federal Bank Limited, including Cash Credit, Bank Guarantee, and Term Loan (IPS). The amount of default was Rs. 38,56,65,007.80 as of 2021-05-31. The corporate debtor failed to meet its debt obligations, leading to its classification as a non-performing asset (NPA). The loans were secured by a charge over properties belonging to the guarantors. The respondents, being the personal guarantors, had undertaken to unconditionally and irrevocably pay the Bank on demand in
…Liquidation of the…
Financial assets of…