The case involves a petition filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner sought to withdraw the case under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, with the liberty to revive the petition in case of a breach of settlement by the respondent/corporate debtor. The corporate debtor has reportedly already received the post-dated cheques.
Mrs. Kulwant Khokhar filed a petition against M/s. Jai Prakash Associates under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner, Mrs. Kulwant Khokhar, sought to withdraw the petition under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The petitioner initially requested the liberty to revive the petition if the respondent/corporate debtor breached the settlement. The corporate debtor had reportedly already received the post-dated cheques. The court ultimately permitted the withdrawal of the petition without the liberty to revive it.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of Allahabad…
Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy…
The case involves a petition filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner sought to withdraw the case under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, with the liberty to revive the petition in case of a breach of settlement by the respondent/corporate debtor. The corporate debtor has reportedly already received the post-dated cheques.
Mrs. Kulwant Khokhar filed a petition against M/s. Jai Prakash Associates under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner, Mrs. Kulwant Khokhar, sought to withdraw the petition under Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The petitioner initially requested the liberty to revive the petition if the respondent/corporate debtor breached the settlement. The corporate debtor had reportedly already received the post-dated cheques. The court ultimately permitted the withdrawal of the petition without the liberty to revive it.
Hearing of Allahabad…
Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy…