The case pertains to an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The counsel for the petitioner states that a petition against the same corporate debtor has already been admitted on 12.04.2019, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed. A copy of the order dated 12.04.2019 is on record.
A petition was filed against a corporate debtor. Prior to the current proceedings, another petition against the same corporate debtor was admitted on 12.04.2019, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. A copy of the order dated 12.04.2019 is on record. Due to the prior admission and IRP appointment, the present application is considered infructuous. The operational creditor is permitted to file a claim before the IRP.
Sign in to view the parties.
A petition against the…
The current application is disposed of, and the…
The case pertains to an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The counsel for the petitioner states that a petition against the same corporate debtor has already been admitted on 12.04.2019, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed. A copy of the order dated 12.04.2019 is on record.
A petition was filed against a corporate debtor. Prior to the current proceedings, another petition against the same corporate debtor was admitted on 12.04.2019, and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed. A copy of the order dated 12.04.2019 is on record. Due to the prior admission and IRP appointment, the present application is considered infructuous. The operational creditor is permitted to file a claim before the IRP.
A petition against the…
The current application is disposed of, and the…