The application was filed under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chandigarh, against M/s Hind Motors Ltd., seeking to set aside communications dated 26.05.2021 and 19.07.2021, where the applicant's claim was rejected by the Resolution Professional. The applicant also sought a direction for the respondent to adjudicate and admit the claim as submitted vide letter dated 13.04.2021.
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chandigarh, filed an application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against M/s Hind Motors Ltd.
The applicant sought to set aside communications dated 26.05.2021 and 19.07.2021, where the Resolution Professional rejected the applicant's claim.
The applicant also sought a direction for the respondent to adjudicate and admit the claim as submitted vide letter dated 13.04.2021.
The applicant claimed that the liquidation proceedings were not intimated by the Resolution Professional or the company.
The Resolution Professional rejected the applicant's claim citing Section 238 of IBC.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Resolution Prof…
Resolution Prof…
The application was filed under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chandigarh, against M/s Hind Motors Ltd., seeking to set aside communications dated 26.05.2021 and 19.07.2021, where the applicant's claim was rejected by the Resolution Professional. The applicant also sought a direction for the respondent to adjudicate and admit the claim as submitted vide letter dated 13.04.2021.
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chandigarh, filed an application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against M/s Hind Motors Ltd.
The applicant sought to set aside communications dated 26.05.2021 and 19.07.2021, where the Resolution Professional rejected the applicant's claim.
The applicant also sought a direction for the respondent to adjudicate and admit the claim as submitted vide letter dated 13.04.2021.
The applicant claimed that the liquidation proceedings were not intimated by the Resolution Professional or the company.
The Resolution Professional rejected the applicant's claim citing Section 238 of IBC.
…Resolution Prof…
Resolution Prof…