The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by Jenis Vora, through her attorney Viraj Vora, against HBS View Private Limited, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The petition was filed on the grounds that the Corporate Debtor failed to make payment of ₹2,16,00,000.00 as principal and ₹67,42,750.00 as interest as on 30.10.2017. The dispute arose from a transaction where the petitioner agreed to sell a flat to the respondent for ₹2.40 crore. The respondent paid an earnest deposit of ₹24.00 lakh but failed to pay the balance. The respondent issued cheques which were dishonored, leading to criminal complaints and subsequent settlement terms. The petitioner then filed this petition
…Jenis Vora, through her attorney Viraj Vora, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against HBS View Private Limited. The dispute originated from a property transaction where Vora agreed to sell a flat to HBS View for ₹2.40 crore. HBS View paid ₹24.00 lakh as an earnest deposit but failed to pay the remaining amount. HBS View issued a cheque for ₹2,13,84,000 which they requested not to be deposited due to financial constraints. Subsequently, two fresh cheques were issued, one for ₹1,14,84,000 and another for ₹99,00,000, but were also dishonored. Vora filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was later settled with consent terms. HBS View then cancelled the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and requested Vora to refund
…Sign in to view the parties.
HBS View Private…
Jenis Vora offered to sell the flat she was…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by Jenis Vora, through her attorney Viraj Vora, against HBS View Private Limited, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The petition was filed on the grounds that the Corporate Debtor failed to make payment of ₹2,16,00,000.00 as principal and ₹67,42,750.00 as interest as on 30.10.2017. The dispute arose from a transaction where the petitioner agreed to sell a flat to the respondent for ₹2.40 crore. The respondent paid an earnest deposit of ₹24.00 lakh but failed to pay the balance. The respondent issued cheques which were dishonored, leading to criminal complaints and subsequent settlement terms. The petitioner then filed this petition
…Jenis Vora, through her attorney Viraj Vora, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against HBS View Private Limited. The dispute originated from a property transaction where Vora agreed to sell a flat to HBS View for ₹2.40 crore. HBS View paid ₹24.00 lakh as an earnest deposit but failed to pay the remaining amount. HBS View issued a cheque for ₹2,13,84,000 which they requested not to be deposited due to financial constraints. Subsequently, two fresh cheques were issued, one for ₹1,14,84,000 and another for ₹99,00,000, but were also dishonored. Vora filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was later settled with consent terms. HBS View then cancelled the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and requested Vora to refund
…HBS View Private…
Jenis Vora offered to sell the flat she was…