M/s. XNG Automation Solutions Private Limited filed CP(IB) No. 149/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/s. GCL Private Limited. The application was based on the corporate debtor's failure to pay an outstanding amount of Rs. 11,82,740/-.
M/s. XNG Automation Solutions Private Limited, an operational creditor, filed an application (CP(IB) No. 149/BB/2019) under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against M/s. GCL Private Limited, the corporate debtor, due to an outstanding debt of Rs. 11,82,740/-. The application was filed on 2019-03-14. The Registry raised office objections on 2019-03-22, which were communicated to the petitioner's counsel on 2019-03-25. The petitioner failed to comply with the objections within the given timeframe. The case was listed on 2019-04-10, 2019-04-22, and 2019-04-23. The petitioner or their counsel were absent on multiple occasions. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in prosecuting the case. This lack of prosecution is relevant because it
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Petition w…
The Registry raised…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
M/s. XNG Automation Solutions Private Limited filed CP(IB) No. 149/BB/2019 under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/s. GCL Private Limited. The application was based on the corporate debtor's failure to pay an outstanding amount of Rs. 11,82,740/-.
M/s. XNG Automation Solutions Private Limited, an operational creditor, filed an application (CP(IB) No. 149/BB/2019) under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against M/s. GCL Private Limited, the corporate debtor, due to an outstanding debt of Rs. 11,82,740/-. The application was filed on 2019-03-14. The Registry raised office objections on 2019-03-22, which were communicated to the petitioner's counsel on 2019-03-25. The petitioner failed to comply with the objections within the given timeframe. The case was listed on 2019-04-10, 2019-04-22, and 2019-04-23. The petitioner or their counsel were absent on multiple occasions. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in prosecuting the case. This lack of prosecution is relevant because it
…The Petition w…
The Registry raised…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.