The case involves an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, seeking the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Frog Fone Pvt. Ltd. The Operational Creditor (OC), Mr. Sonu Kumar, claims an outstanding amount of Rs.7,00,300/- for material supplied to the Corporate Debtor (CD).
Mr. Sonu Kumar, the Operational Creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, against M/s. Frog Fone Pvt. Ltd., the Corporate Debtor, claiming an outstanding amount of Rs.7,00,300/- for materials supplied on July 7, 2018, based on a purchase order issued by the Corporate Debtor on June 29, 2018. The Operational Creditor also placed the invoice dated July 7, 2018, on record and had sent a notice under Section 8 of the IBC, 2016, to the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor defended by stating that the supplied goods were defective and that no opportunity was given to them for testing and verifying the material. The Corporate Debtor admitted that no debit note or written communication was sent to the Operational Creditor regarding the defective goods.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Corporate Debtor…
The Operational…
The case involves an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, seeking the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Frog Fone Pvt. Ltd. The Operational Creditor (OC), Mr. Sonu Kumar, claims an outstanding amount of Rs.7,00,300/- for material supplied to the Corporate Debtor (CD).
Mr. Sonu Kumar, the Operational Creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, against M/s. Frog Fone Pvt. Ltd., the Corporate Debtor, claiming an outstanding amount of Rs.7,00,300/- for materials supplied on July 7, 2018, based on a purchase order issued by the Corporate Debtor on June 29, 2018. The Operational Creditor also placed the invoice dated July 7, 2018, on record and had sent a notice under Section 8 of the IBC, 2016, to the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor defended by stating that the supplied goods were defective and that no opportunity was given to them for testing and verifying the material. The Corporate Debtor admitted that no debit note or written communication was sent to the Operational Creditor regarding the defective goods.
The Corporate Debtor…
The Operational…