The case pertains to CP.IB/33/CHE/2021 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai. The applicant and respondent were represented by advocates via video conferencing. The matter was settled out of court by full and final payment made by the respondent.
EBM-Papst India Pvt Ltd filed a case (CP.IB/33/CHE/2021) against ETA Engineering Pvt Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC 2016. The applicant, EBM-Papst India Pvt Ltd, was represented by Ms. Apporva Vinjamur, Advocate. The respondent, ETA Engineering Pvt Ltd, was represented by Ms. Lily Francis, Advocate, through video conferencing. The parties informed the court that the matter had been settled out of court with a full and final payment made by the respondent. A memo to this effect was filed in the Registry on 2021-06-28 (SR No.2535). Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Sign in to view the parties.
A memo regarding the…
Hearing held on…
The case pertains to CP.IB/33/CHE/2021 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai. The applicant and respondent were represented by advocates via video conferencing. The matter was settled out of court by full and final payment made by the respondent.
EBM-Papst India Pvt Ltd filed a case (CP.IB/33/CHE/2021) against ETA Engineering Pvt Ltd under Section 9 of the IBC 2016. The applicant, EBM-Papst India Pvt Ltd, was represented by Ms. Apporva Vinjamur, Advocate. The respondent, ETA Engineering Pvt Ltd, was represented by Ms. Lily Francis, Advocate, through video conferencing. The parties informed the court that the matter had been settled out of court with a full and final payment made by the respondent. A memo to this effect was filed in the Registry on 2021-06-28 (SR No.2535). Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
A memo regarding the…
Hearing held on…