The case involves CP.IB/33/CHE/2021 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai. The applicant is represented by Ms. Apporva Vinjamur, Advocate, and the respondent is represented by Ms. Lily Francis, Advocate, through video conferencing. The matter was settled out of court with a full and final payment made by the respondent, and a memo to that effect was filed in the Registry on 2021-06-28.
The case CP.IB/33/CHE/2021 was filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai. EBM-Papst India Pvt Ltd was the petitioner, and ETA Engineering Pvt Ltd was the respondent. The application was filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016. The applicant was represented by Ms. Apporva Vinjamur, and the respondent was represented by Ms. Lily Francis. The parties informed the court that they had settled the matter out of court through a full and final payment made by the respondent. A memo regarding this settlement was filed in the Registry on 2021-06-28. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The key fact is the out-of-court settlement, which led to the dismissal of the application.
Sign in to view the parties.
A memo regarding the…
Hearing held on…
The case involves CP.IB/33/CHE/2021 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai. The applicant is represented by Ms. Apporva Vinjamur, Advocate, and the respondent is represented by Ms. Lily Francis, Advocate, through video conferencing. The matter was settled out of court with a full and final payment made by the respondent, and a memo to that effect was filed in the Registry on 2021-06-28.
The case CP.IB/33/CHE/2021 was filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai. EBM-Papst India Pvt Ltd was the petitioner, and ETA Engineering Pvt Ltd was the respondent. The application was filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016. The applicant was represented by Ms. Apporva Vinjamur, and the respondent was represented by Ms. Lily Francis. The parties informed the court that they had settled the matter out of court through a full and final payment made by the respondent. A memo regarding this settlement was filed in the Registry on 2021-06-28. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The key fact is the out-of-court settlement, which led to the dismissal of the application.
A memo regarding the…
Hearing held on…