The case involves an application (CA-952(PB)/2019) before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, Principal Bench, concerning Union Bank of India as the applicant/petitioner and Era Infra Engineering Limited as the respondent. The application relates to an order under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (CIRP). The Resolution Professional's counsel, Mr. Atul Sharma, stated that a reply to the application was unnecessary due to a similar statement already made in a related application (CA-1224(PB)/2018).
Union Bank of India filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Era Infra Engineering Limited. A similar application, CA-1224(PB)/2018, was previously considered. The Resolution Professional's counsel, Mr. Atul Sharma, stated that the Arbitral Tribunal could hear claims and counterclaims but no recovery could be made from the corporate debtor during the moratorium period. This concession was made without prejudice to the rights of the corporate debtor. The NCLT disposed of the application, directing the Arbitral Tribunal to proceed accordingly. The judgment dated 2018-08-03 rendered by the National Company Appellate Law Tribunal in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 285/2018 is relevant to the claim.
Sign in to view the parties.
Judgment dated 03.08.2018 rendered by the…
CA-1224(PB)/20…
The case involves an application (CA-952(PB)/2019) before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi, Principal Bench, concerning Union Bank of India as the applicant/petitioner and Era Infra Engineering Limited as the respondent. The application relates to an order under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (CIRP). The Resolution Professional's counsel, Mr. Atul Sharma, stated that a reply to the application was unnecessary due to a similar statement already made in a related application (CA-1224(PB)/2018).
Union Bank of India filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Era Infra Engineering Limited. A similar application, CA-1224(PB)/2018, was previously considered. The Resolution Professional's counsel, Mr. Atul Sharma, stated that the Arbitral Tribunal could hear claims and counterclaims but no recovery could be made from the corporate debtor during the moratorium period. This concession was made without prejudice to the rights of the corporate debtor. The NCLT disposed of the application, directing the Arbitral Tribunal to proceed accordingly. The judgment dated 2018-08-03 rendered by the National Company Appellate Law Tribunal in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 285/2018 is relevant to the claim.
Judgment dated 03.08.2018 rendered by the…
CA-1224(PB)/20…