The case involves a Corporate Insolvency Resolution (CIR) process initiated against EMU Lines Private Limited. A joint application was filed by the parties involved, seeking the termination of the CIR process. The matter was brought to the attention of the members of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), who had previously admitted the CIR process.
Mr. Vishal Kaushik initiated a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. EMU Lines Private Limited under Section 9 of the IBC Code, 2016. A joint application was filed by the parties to terminate the CIRP. The petitioner's claim was settled in full with a demand draft of Rs. 69,634 tendered on October 16, 2019, and accepted by the Operational Creditor. The petitioner expressed no further interest in pursuing the CIRP. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Ashok Kriplani, had not taken any steps, and no Committee of Creditors (COC) was constituted. The NCLT considered the application, noting the settlement and lack of progress in the CIRP. The NCLT allowed the prayer of the applicant and terminated the CIRP, releasing the Corporate Debtor from
…Sign in to view the parties.
The claim o…
A Demand Draft of Rs.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a Corporate Insolvency Resolution (CIR) process initiated against EMU Lines Private Limited. A joint application was filed by the parties involved, seeking the termination of the CIR process. The matter was brought to the attention of the members of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), who had previously admitted the CIR process.
Mr. Vishal Kaushik initiated a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. EMU Lines Private Limited under Section 9 of the IBC Code, 2016. A joint application was filed by the parties to terminate the CIRP. The petitioner's claim was settled in full with a demand draft of Rs. 69,634 tendered on October 16, 2019, and accepted by the Operational Creditor. The petitioner expressed no further interest in pursuing the CIRP. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Ashok Kriplani, had not taken any steps, and no Committee of Creditors (COC) was constituted. The NCLT considered the application, noting the settlement and lack of progress in the CIRP. The NCLT allowed the prayer of the applicant and terminated the CIRP, releasing the Corporate Debtor from
…The claim o…
A Demand Draft of Rs.…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.