The application was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Manish Kumar and his wife, Renu Meena, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Drishti India Limited. The applicants claimed that they had provided a loan to the corporate debtor, which was not repaid. The corporate debtor argued that the amount was not a loan but a security deposit for a development agreement and that the application was not maintainable.
Manish Kumar and Renu Meena filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate CIRP against Drishti India Limited, claiming to be financial creditors. The applicants had obtained a loan of Rs. 2 crores against their house, out of which Rs. 1.90 crores were transferred to Renu Meena's account and then to the corporate debtor's account on 2011-12-15. The applicants claimed this was a loan with a 24% interest rate. The corporate debtor contended that the amount was not a loan but a security deposit for a development agreement with Saj Housing Private Limited, where the corporate debtor allotted land. The corporate debtor argued that the applicants were aware of this agreement and that the amount was consideration for development
…Sign in to view the parties.
Drishti India Limited…
Municipal corporation…
The application was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Manish Kumar and his wife, Renu Meena, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Drishti India Limited. The applicants claimed that they had provided a loan to the corporate debtor, which was not repaid. The corporate debtor argued that the amount was not a loan but a security deposit for a development agreement and that the application was not maintainable.
Manish Kumar and Renu Meena filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate CIRP against Drishti India Limited, claiming to be financial creditors. The applicants had obtained a loan of Rs. 2 crores against their house, out of which Rs. 1.90 crores were transferred to Renu Meena's account and then to the corporate debtor's account on 2011-12-15. The applicants claimed this was a loan with a 24% interest rate. The corporate debtor contended that the amount was not a loan but a security deposit for a development agreement with Saj Housing Private Limited, where the corporate debtor allotted land. The corporate debtor argued that the applicants were aware of this agreement and that the amount was consideration for development
…Drishti India Limited…
Municipal corporation…