The case involves an appeal against an order dated 15.07.2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Division Bench-I, Chennai, in MA/13/CHE/2021 in IBA/1459/2019. The appellant, Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder, challenges the NCLT's decision to dismiss an application related to the insolvency resolution process of Appu Hotels Limited. The appellant argues that the resolution process is flawed due to statutory violations and that the Adjudicating Authority failed to adequately address the grievances of unsecured financial creditors.
Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder, the appellant, is challenging an order passed by the NCLT Chennai regarding the insolvency resolution process of Appu Hotels Limited. The appellant claims that the resolution process is vitiated by statutory violations, including improper valuation of assets and exclusion of financial creditors from the CoC. The appellant argues that the Adjudicating Authority failed to interfere with attempts to acquire the Corporate Debtor's assets for less than 25% of their actual value. The appellant also alleges that the Resolution Professional and Interim Resolution Professional facilitated a process that undervalued the assets of Appu Hotels, benefiting the 2nd Respondent, Mr. M.K. Rajagopalan. The appellant has expressed willingness to pay all
…Sign in to view the parties.
Mention of IBA/1459/2019…
Corporate Ins…
The case involves an appeal against an order dated 15.07.2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Division Bench-I, Chennai, in MA/13/CHE/2021 in IBA/1459/2019. The appellant, Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder, challenges the NCLT's decision to dismiss an application related to the insolvency resolution process of Appu Hotels Limited. The appellant argues that the resolution process is flawed due to statutory violations and that the Adjudicating Authority failed to adequately address the grievances of unsecured financial creditors.
Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder, the appellant, is challenging an order passed by the NCLT Chennai regarding the insolvency resolution process of Appu Hotels Limited. The appellant claims that the resolution process is vitiated by statutory violations, including improper valuation of assets and exclusion of financial creditors from the CoC. The appellant argues that the Adjudicating Authority failed to interfere with attempts to acquire the Corporate Debtor's assets for less than 25% of their actual value. The appellant also alleges that the Resolution Professional and Interim Resolution Professional facilitated a process that undervalued the assets of Appu Hotels, benefiting the 2nd Respondent, Mr. M.K. Rajagopalan. The appellant has expressed willingness to pay all
…Mention of IBA/1459/2019…
Corporate Ins…