The case involves an application (C.A. 73/2018) filed by the Committee of Creditors (COC) to replace the Resolution Professional (RP). Notice was served to the previous RP, Mr. Mukesh Mohan. The COC also requested an extension of the time limit for the resolution process.
The Committee of Creditors (COC) filed an application (C.A. 73/2018) seeking to replace the existing Resolution Professional (RP). The previous RP, Mr. Mukesh Mohan, was notified and did not object to the replacement. The COC also requested an extension of the time limit for conducting the resolution process. The court was informed that Expressions of Interest (EOIs) had been received and would be presented to the COC for consideration. The relevance of these facts is that they pertain to the procedural aspects of the insolvency resolution process, specifically the replacement of the RP and the extension of the resolution timeline.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing before the New…
C.A. 73/2018 filed by…
The case involves an application (C.A. 73/2018) filed by the Committee of Creditors (COC) to replace the Resolution Professional (RP). Notice was served to the previous RP, Mr. Mukesh Mohan. The COC also requested an extension of the time limit for the resolution process.
The Committee of Creditors (COC) filed an application (C.A. 73/2018) seeking to replace the existing Resolution Professional (RP). The previous RP, Mr. Mukesh Mohan, was notified and did not object to the replacement. The COC also requested an extension of the time limit for conducting the resolution process. The court was informed that Expressions of Interest (EOIs) had been received and would be presented to the COC for consideration. The relevance of these facts is that they pertain to the procedural aspects of the insolvency resolution process, specifically the replacement of the RP and the extension of the resolution timeline.
Hearing before the New…
C.A. 73/2018 filed by…