The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by an Operational Creditor, Vaddi Raja, against the Corporate Debtor, Bevcon Wayors Pvt Ltd. The matter was filed as CP(IB) No. 343/9/HDB/2019 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench. The Operational Creditor claimed an outstanding operational debt from the Corporate Debtor.
Vaddi Raja, the Operational Creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Bevcon Wayors Pvt Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, for an outstanding operational debt. During the proceedings, both parties reached a settlement. A joint memo was filed on 06.07.2019 stating that the matter was settled, with part payment already made and a post-dated cheque issued for the remaining balance. The settlement terms were incorporated into a settlement agreement. The Operational Creditor then sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court noted that the petition had not yet been admitted, and no IRP had been appointed. The relevance of the settlement is that it allowed the parties to resolve the dispute outside of the formal insolvency process, saving time and
…Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing o…
Hearing o…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by an Operational Creditor, Vaddi Raja, against the Corporate Debtor, Bevcon Wayors Pvt Ltd. The matter was filed as CP(IB) No. 343/9/HDB/2019 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench. The Operational Creditor claimed an outstanding operational debt from the Corporate Debtor.
Vaddi Raja, the Operational Creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Bevcon Wayors Pvt Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, for an outstanding operational debt. During the proceedings, both parties reached a settlement. A joint memo was filed on 06.07.2019 stating that the matter was settled, with part payment already made and a post-dated cheque issued for the remaining balance. The settlement terms were incorporated into a settlement agreement. The Operational Creditor then sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court noted that the petition had not yet been admitted, and no IRP had been appointed. The relevance of the settlement is that it allowed the parties to resolve the dispute outside of the formal insolvency process, saving time and
…Hearing o…
Hearing o…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.