The case involves a petition filed under Section 95(1) of the IBC. The matter was initially fixed for hearing on 05.07.2021 but was taken up earlier on 29.06.2021 based on a mentioning via email.
Bank of Baroda filed a petition against Punam Singh under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The matter was initially scheduled for a hearing on July 5, 2021, but was advanced to June 29, 2021, due to a request made via email. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Avishek Guha, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The reason for the withdrawal was that the proposed Resolution Professional was already acting as the Liquidator for the Corporate Debtor. The court acknowledged these submissions and subsequently dismissed the petition, CP(IB)/131(KB)2021, as withdrawn, while granting the applicant the option to file a new petition in compliance with the law.
Sign in to view the parties.
The matter was taken up…
The matte…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 95(1) of the IBC. The matter was initially fixed for hearing on 05.07.2021 but was taken up earlier on 29.06.2021 based on a mentioning via email.
Bank of Baroda filed a petition against Punam Singh under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The matter was initially scheduled for a hearing on July 5, 2021, but was advanced to June 29, 2021, due to a request made via email. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Avishek Guha, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The reason for the withdrawal was that the proposed Resolution Professional was already acting as the Liquidator for the Corporate Debtor. The court acknowledged these submissions and subsequently dismissed the petition, CP(IB)/131(KB)2021, as withdrawn, while granting the applicant the option to file a new petition in compliance with the law.
The matter was taken up…
The matte…