The case involves EKF Global Logistics Private Limited as the petitioner against B Y Agro & Infra Limited. The order sheet pertains to a hearing held on January 12, 2021. The court convened through video conference. The counsel for the petitioner was present, but there was no representation from the respondent. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that a matter against the same corporate debtor had already been admitted, and CIRP was initiated by the same bench in C.P. 4240 of 2018, with an order dated May 26, 2020.
EKF Global Logistics Private Limited filed a petition against B Y Agro & Infra Limited. The hearing was held on January 12, 2021. The petitioner's counsel was present, but the respondent had no representation. The petitioner's counsel submitted that a matter against the same corporate debtor was already admitted, and CIRP was initiated by the same bench in C.P. 4240 of 2018, with an order dated May 26, 2020. This prior admission and initiation of CIRP are the key facts that led the court to dismiss the current petition as infructuous. The petitioner was directed to file their claim with the IRP.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed in C.P. 4240 of 2018 admitting the…
Hearing held where the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves EKF Global Logistics Private Limited as the petitioner against B Y Agro & Infra Limited. The order sheet pertains to a hearing held on January 12, 2021. The court convened through video conference. The counsel for the petitioner was present, but there was no representation from the respondent. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that a matter against the same corporate debtor had already been admitted, and CIRP was initiated by the same bench in C.P. 4240 of 2018, with an order dated May 26, 2020.
EKF Global Logistics Private Limited filed a petition against B Y Agro & Infra Limited. The hearing was held on January 12, 2021. The petitioner's counsel was present, but the respondent had no representation. The petitioner's counsel submitted that a matter against the same corporate debtor was already admitted, and CIRP was initiated by the same bench in C.P. 4240 of 2018, with an order dated May 26, 2020. This prior admission and initiation of CIRP are the key facts that led the court to dismiss the current petition as infructuous. The petitioner was directed to file their claim with the IRP.
Order passed in C.P. 4240 of 2018 admitting the…
Hearing held where the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.