The case involves a dispute over the reconstitution of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s.Arun Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Kotak Mahindra Bank, the financial creditor, filed an application seeking to set aside the unilateral action of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in reconstituting the CoC. The CIRP was initiated based on an order dated January 31, 2020. The IRP initially constituted a CoC limited to the 'Auroville' project, following an NCLAT judgment. Subsequently, the IRP sought to reconstitute the CoC, leading to the current dispute.
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a financial creditor, initiated CIRP against M/s. Arun Shelters Pvt. Ltd. The CIRP was admitted on January 31, 2020, and Mr. Pankaj Srivastava was appointed as the IRP. Initially, the IRP constituted a CoC limited to the 'Auroville' project, based on an NCLAT judgment regarding project-specific CIRP. The IRP then sought to reconstitute the CoC, allowing claims from other creditors, which led to objections from Kotak Mahindra Bank. The IRP conducted three CoC meetings before attempting to reconstitute the CoC. The applicant contended that the IRP's action was unilateral and violated the IBC. The Resolution Professional argued that the reconstitution was necessary to rectify a mistake and align with the NCLAT judgment. The same legal
…Sign in to view the parties.
CIRP initiated against…
IRP published a public…
The case involves a dispute over the reconstitution of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s.Arun Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Kotak Mahindra Bank, the financial creditor, filed an application seeking to set aside the unilateral action of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in reconstituting the CoC. The CIRP was initiated based on an order dated January 31, 2020. The IRP initially constituted a CoC limited to the 'Auroville' project, following an NCLAT judgment. Subsequently, the IRP sought to reconstitute the CoC, leading to the current dispute.
M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a financial creditor, initiated CIRP against M/s. Arun Shelters Pvt. Ltd. The CIRP was admitted on January 31, 2020, and Mr. Pankaj Srivastava was appointed as the IRP. Initially, the IRP constituted a CoC limited to the 'Auroville' project, based on an NCLAT judgment regarding project-specific CIRP. The IRP then sought to reconstitute the CoC, allowing claims from other creditors, which led to objections from Kotak Mahindra Bank. The IRP conducted three CoC meetings before attempting to reconstitute the CoC. The applicant contended that the IRP's action was unilateral and violated the IBC. The Resolution Professional argued that the reconstitution was necessary to rectify a mistake and align with the NCLAT judgment. The same legal
…CIRP initiated against…
IRP published a public…