The petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Magma Fincorp Ltd., claiming to be a 'Financial Creditor' with a 'financial debt' of Rs. 1,11,50,922/- against Amrapali Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner asserted that the amount was recoverable as per their books of accounts and was in default.
Magma Fincorp Ltd. filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming to be a financial creditor of Amrapali Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The claimed financial debt amounted to Rs. 1,11,50,922/-, which Magma Fincorp asserted was recoverable and in default. However, the NCLT noted that another insolvency petition filed by Bank of Baroda against Amrapali Infrastructure Private Limited had already been admitted. The court considered the fact that a second insolvency process cannot be initiated against a corporate debtor already undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Insolven…
Judgment delivered by…
The petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by Magma Fincorp Ltd., claiming to be a 'Financial Creditor' with a 'financial debt' of Rs. 1,11,50,922/- against Amrapali Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner asserted that the amount was recoverable as per their books of accounts and was in default.
Magma Fincorp Ltd. filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming to be a financial creditor of Amrapali Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The claimed financial debt amounted to Rs. 1,11,50,922/-, which Magma Fincorp asserted was recoverable and in default. However, the NCLT noted that another insolvency petition filed by Bank of Baroda against Amrapali Infrastructure Private Limited had already been admitted. The court considered the fact that a second insolvency process cannot be initiated against a corporate debtor already undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process.
The Insolven…
Judgment delivered by…