The counsel for the Corporate Debtor appeared without holding Vakalatnama, stating he was representing the arguing counsel. The Corporate Debtor filed an impleadment application to include a third party in the proceedings. The court noted that the Corporate Debtor's actions appeared to be an attempt to delay the matter. The court observed that under the IBC, a party cannot file an impleadment or maintainability application. The court also expressed concern about the practice of sending someone else to take adjournments.

The counsel for the Corporate Debtor appeared without holding Vakalatnama, stating he was representing the arguing counsel. The Corporate Debtor filed an impleadment application to include a third party in the proceedings. The court noted that the Corporate Debtor's actions appeared to be an attempt to delay the matter. The court observed that under the IBC, a party cannot file an impleadment or maintainability application. The court also expressed concern about the practice of sending someone else to take adjournments.