The document is an attendance-cum-order sheet from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, regarding a hearing on August 24, 2017. The case involves M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd as the petitioner and M/s Agrante Infra Ltd as the respondent. The order pertains to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, held a hearing on August 24, 2017, involving M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd as the petitioner and M/s Agrante Infra Ltd as the respondent. The case is governed by Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. Mr. Nachiketa Goyal and Mr. Mayank Bughani appeared as advocates for the petitioner and respondent, respectively. Mr. Pradeep Debnath was present as the Corporate Debtor. Based on recommendations from the IBBI, Mr. Harkesh Taneja was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The counsels for both parties were present in court and informed about the appointment. The petitioner is required to notify the IRP and take necessary steps under the statute, including filing a report.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing before the New…
Mr. Harkesh Taneja…
The document is an attendance-cum-order sheet from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, regarding a hearing on August 24, 2017. The case involves M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd as the petitioner and M/s Agrante Infra Ltd as the respondent. The order pertains to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, held a hearing on August 24, 2017, involving M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd as the petitioner and M/s Agrante Infra Ltd as the respondent. The case is governed by Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. Mr. Nachiketa Goyal and Mr. Mayank Bughani appeared as advocates for the petitioner and respondent, respectively. Mr. Pradeep Debnath was present as the Corporate Debtor. Based on recommendations from the IBBI, Mr. Harkesh Taneja was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The counsels for both parties were present in court and informed about the appointment. The petitioner is required to notify the IRP and take necessary steps under the statute, including filing a report.
Hearing before the New…
Mr. Harkesh Taneja…