The matter came up for consideration on 11th January 2019, and the counsel requested an adjournment. On 15th January 2019, the counsel requested more time to file additional documents. On 1st February 2019, notice was directed to be issued to the Corporate Debtor. Indulgence was granted again on 18th February 2019. On 16th March 2019, another adjournment was requested. The petitioner changed counsel but took no steps. Various opportunities have been granted to the petitioner. A fresh prayer is made to effect service in terms of previous orders.
The case involves M/s. BSA Polycontainer Pvt. Ltd. V/s. M/s. Advance Surfactants India Ltd. The matter was initially presented on January 11, 2019, and the petitioner's counsel requested an adjournment. Further time was requested on January 15, 2019, to file additional documents. Notice was directed to the Corporate Debtor on February 1, 2019. The petitioner failed to take necessary steps despite granted indulgences. Another adjournment was requested on March 16, 2019. The petitioner changed counsel but did not take any steps. The court granted multiple opportunities to the petitioner. The court considered dismissing the case for non-prosecution due to the delays and the nature of IBC proceedings, which require swift resolution. The petitioner was given a final
…Sign in to view the parties.
Matter came up for…
Ld. Counsel prayed for…
The matter came up for consideration on 11th January 2019, and the counsel requested an adjournment. On 15th January 2019, the counsel requested more time to file additional documents. On 1st February 2019, notice was directed to be issued to the Corporate Debtor. Indulgence was granted again on 18th February 2019. On 16th March 2019, another adjournment was requested. The petitioner changed counsel but took no steps. Various opportunities have been granted to the petitioner. A fresh prayer is made to effect service in terms of previous orders.
The case involves M/s. BSA Polycontainer Pvt. Ltd. V/s. M/s. Advance Surfactants India Ltd. The matter was initially presented on January 11, 2019, and the petitioner's counsel requested an adjournment. Further time was requested on January 15, 2019, to file additional documents. Notice was directed to the Corporate Debtor on February 1, 2019. The petitioner failed to take necessary steps despite granted indulgences. Another adjournment was requested on March 16, 2019. The petitioner changed counsel but did not take any steps. The court granted multiple opportunities to the petitioner. The court considered dismissing the case for non-prosecution due to the delays and the nature of IBC proceedings, which require swift resolution. The petitioner was given a final
…Matter came up for…
Ld. Counsel prayed for…