The case pertains to CP(IB) 4424(MB)/2018 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. The Operational Creditor's counsel has filed an affidavit of service indicating that notice was served to the Corporate Debtor. However, as of the hearing date, no reply has been filed by the Corporate Debtor, and there is no representation from their side.
The Operational Creditor initiated proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, Accord Mediplus Pvt Ltd, under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Operational Creditor's counsel filed an affidavit confirming that the Corporate Debtor was served notice. Despite the service of notice, the Corporate Debtor has not filed any reply or made any representation before the court. The lack of response from the Corporate Debtor is a key fact influencing the court's decision to grant them additional time to file a reply.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
Case liste…
The case pertains to CP(IB) 4424(MB)/2018 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. The Operational Creditor's counsel has filed an affidavit of service indicating that notice was served to the Corporate Debtor. However, as of the hearing date, no reply has been filed by the Corporate Debtor, and there is no representation from their side.
The Operational Creditor initiated proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, Accord Mediplus Pvt Ltd, under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Operational Creditor's counsel filed an affidavit confirming that the Corporate Debtor was served notice. Despite the service of notice, the Corporate Debtor has not filed any reply or made any representation before the court. The lack of response from the Corporate Debtor is a key fact influencing the court's decision to grant them additional time to file a reply.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
Case liste…