The case pertains to CP(IB) 4424(MB)/2018 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. The Operational Creditor's counsel has filed an affidavit of service indicating that notice has been served to the Corporate Debtor. However, as of the hearing date, no reply has been filed by the Corporate Debtor, and there is no representation on their behalf.
R.K. Gaikwad, the Operational Creditor, initiated proceedings against Accord Mediplus Pvt Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Operational Creditor's counsel filed an affidavit of service, confirming that the Corporate Debtor was served notice. Despite the service of notice, the Corporate Debtor has not filed any reply or made any representation before the tribunal. The absence of a response from the Corporate Debtor is a key fact influencing the tribunal's decision to grant them further time to file a reply.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of Mumbai Bench…
Case liste…
The case pertains to CP(IB) 4424(MB)/2018 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. The Operational Creditor's counsel has filed an affidavit of service indicating that notice has been served to the Corporate Debtor. However, as of the hearing date, no reply has been filed by the Corporate Debtor, and there is no representation on their behalf.
R.K. Gaikwad, the Operational Creditor, initiated proceedings against Accord Mediplus Pvt Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Operational Creditor's counsel filed an affidavit of service, confirming that the Corporate Debtor was served notice. Despite the service of notice, the Corporate Debtor has not filed any reply or made any representation before the tribunal. The absence of a response from the Corporate Debtor is a key fact influencing the tribunal's decision to grant them further time to file a reply.
Hearing of Mumbai Bench…
Case liste…