The case pertains to CP(IB) No. 376/9/HDB/2019 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was previously appointed in CP(IB) No. 540/9/HDB/2018. The respondent in the previous CP and the present CP are the same entity.
A petition was filed under CP(IB) No. 376/9/HDB/2019. An IRP had already been appointed in CP(IB) No. 540/9/HDB/2018. The respondent in both cases is the same, Acaricide India Pvt Ltd. The petitioner, Arysta Life Sciences India Ltd, was directed to make their claim before the IRP. The case was filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The court then closed CP(IB) No. 376/9/HDB/2019.
Sign in to view the parties.
An IRP was appo…
Hearing held on…
The case pertains to CP(IB) No. 376/9/HDB/2019 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad Bench. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was previously appointed in CP(IB) No. 540/9/HDB/2018. The respondent in the previous CP and the present CP are the same entity.
A petition was filed under CP(IB) No. 376/9/HDB/2019. An IRP had already been appointed in CP(IB) No. 540/9/HDB/2018. The respondent in both cases is the same, Acaricide India Pvt Ltd. The petitioner, Arysta Life Sciences India Ltd, was directed to make their claim before the IRP. The case was filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The court then closed CP(IB) No. 376/9/HDB/2019.
An IRP was appo…
Hearing held on…