The document pertains to a case before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, concerning a company petition. The attendance-cum-order sheet indicates a hearing on September 4, 2017. Jai Ambe Enterprise is listed as the petitioner against A R Coating Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. The case is related to the Companies Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&BP Code) of 2016.
The key facts are as follows: A company petition was filed by Jai Ambe Enterprise against A R Coating Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. before the NCLT Mumbai Bench. The case was heard on September 4, 2017. The petitioner, through their professional representative, filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition. This indicates a potential change in circumstances or strategy on the part of the petitioner, leading to the withdrawal of the initial petition. The relevance of these facts lies in the procedural aspect of insolvency proceedings, where withdrawal and refiling are permitted under certain conditions.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
The professional…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The document pertains to a case before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, concerning a company petition. The attendance-cum-order sheet indicates a hearing on September 4, 2017. Jai Ambe Enterprise is listed as the petitioner against A R Coating Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. The case is related to the Companies Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&BP Code) of 2016.
The key facts are as follows: A company petition was filed by Jai Ambe Enterprise against A R Coating Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. before the NCLT Mumbai Bench. The case was heard on September 4, 2017. The petitioner, through their professional representative, filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition. This indicates a potential change in circumstances or strategy on the part of the petitioner, leading to the withdrawal of the initial petition. The relevance of these facts lies in the procedural aspect of insolvency proceedings, where withdrawal and refiling are permitted under certain conditions.
Hearing of the Mumbai…
The professional…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.