The Appellants, claiming to be employees, were allegedly wrongly ousted by the 'Resolution Professional'. The 'Resolution Professional' is treating them as ex-employees, while the Appellants claim to be employees on roll and cooperating with the 'Resolution Professional'. There is a dispute as to whether the Appellants are present or ex-employees.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. (Appellants) claim to be employees wrongly ousted by the Resolution Professional of AML Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors. (Respondents). The Appellants assert they are current employees, while the Resolution Professional treats them as former employees. The core dispute revolves around the employment status of the Appellants and whether they are entitled to be considered current employees of the Corporate Debtor. The Appellants were directed to provide evidence of their employment to the Resolution Professional.
Sign in to view the parties.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The Appellants, claiming to be employees, were allegedly wrongly ousted by the 'Resolution Professional'. The 'Resolution Professional' is treating them as ex-employees, while the Appellants claim to be employees on roll and cooperating with the 'Resolution Professional'. There is a dispute as to whether the Appellants are present or ex-employees.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. (Appellants) claim to be employees wrongly ousted by the Resolution Professional of AML Steel and Power Ltd. & Ors. (Respondents). The Appellants assert they are current employees, while the Resolution Professional treats them as former employees. The core dispute revolves around the employment status of the Appellants and whether they are entitled to be considered current employees of the Corporate Debtor. The Appellants were directed to provide evidence of their employment to the Resolution Professional.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.