Several company appeals were filed with defects. The registry notified the appellants of these defects, and the appellants refiled the appeals after some delay. The Registrar placed the matter before the court, questioning whether the delay in refiling should be condoned. A three-member bench doubted the correctness of earlier judgments of the tribunal, which held that if defects in an appeal are cured after 7 days, the appeal should be treated as a fresh appeal. The bench referred the matter to a larger bench to decide the following questions: Whether the law laid down by this Tribunal in “Mr. Jitendra Virmani Vs. MRO-TEK Realty Ltd. & Ors” and three Member Bench Judgement in “Arul Muthu Kumaara Samy Vs. Registrar of Companies" that when the defect in appeal

Several company appeals were filed with defects. The registry notified the appellants of these defects, and the appellants refiled the appeals after some delay. The Registrar placed the matter before the court, questioning whether the delay in refiling should be condoned. A three-member bench doubted the correctness of earlier judgments of the tribunal, which held that if defects in an appeal are cured after 7 days, the appeal should be treated as a fresh appeal. The bench referred the matter to a larger bench to decide the following questions: Whether the law laid down by this Tribunal in “Mr. Jitendra Virmani Vs. MRO-TEK Realty Ltd. & Ors” and three Member Bench Judgement in “Arul Muthu Kumaara Samy Vs. Registrar of Companies" that when the defect in appeal