The case involves a settlement agreement between the appellant and some respondents/allottees, with various emails allegedly showing acceptance of the terms by other respondents/allottees. The NCLAT is reviewing the settlement and the need for a better affidavit.
The appellant, Vishwajeet Jhavar, and the respondents, Jay Nihalani & Ors., are involved in a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 884 of 2025 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The matter was heard in hybrid mode on June 25, 2025, with senior counsel representing both sides, including Mr. Arun Kathpalia for the appellant and Ms. Kanchi Ahuja, Mr. Chaitanya Nikte, and Mr. Ayush J Rajani for the respondents and IRP, respectively.
…The NCLAT heard the matter, noting the…
The case is listed for further hearing, by which…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a settlement agreement between the appellant and some respondents/allottees, with various emails allegedly showing acceptance of the terms by other respondents/allottees. The NCLAT is reviewing the settlement and the need for a better affidavit.
The appellant, Vishwajeet Jhavar, and the respondents, Jay Nihalani & Ors., are involved in a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 884 of 2025 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The matter was heard in hybrid mode on June 25, 2025, with senior counsel representing both sides, including Mr. Arun Kathpalia for the appellant and Ms. Kanchi Ahuja, Mr. Chaitanya Nikte, and Mr. Ayush J Rajani for the respondents and IRP, respectively.
…The NCLAT heard the matter, noting the…
The case is listed for further hearing, by which…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.