The appeal was filed against an order dated 2021-08-30 by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, which admitted an application under Section 9 filed by the Respondent. The Respondent had issued a notice under Section 8 to the Appellant for its operational debt, which was not replied to. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9, which was also not replied to. The Adjudicating Authority granted several opportunities, but the Appellant did not file any reply. The Corporate Debtor was given many opportunities to file the reply on several occasions since beginning but the Corporate Debtor did not bother to file reply. The Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte and admitted the application.
The Respondent, Shree Shyam Trading Company, issued a notice under Section 8 to the Appellant, Vinay Kumar Ranchhoddas Mohota, for its operational debt, as per a demand notice dated 2019-11-25, which was not replied to by the Appellant. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9, which was also not replied to. The Adjudicating Authority granted several opportunities to the Appellant to file a reply, but the Appellant did not avail of these opportunities. The Adjudicating Authority noted that the matter had come up for hearing on several occasions. The Corporate Debtor was given many opportunities to file the reply on several occasions since beginning but the Corporate Debtor did not bother to file reply. The Adjudicating Authority
…Sign in to view the parties.
Respondent issued a…
Counsel for the…
The appeal was filed against an order dated 2021-08-30 by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, which admitted an application under Section 9 filed by the Respondent. The Respondent had issued a notice under Section 8 to the Appellant for its operational debt, which was not replied to. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9, which was also not replied to. The Adjudicating Authority granted several opportunities, but the Appellant did not file any reply. The Corporate Debtor was given many opportunities to file the reply on several occasions since beginning but the Corporate Debtor did not bother to file reply. The Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte and admitted the application.
The Respondent, Shree Shyam Trading Company, issued a notice under Section 8 to the Appellant, Vinay Kumar Ranchhoddas Mohota, for its operational debt, as per a demand notice dated 2019-11-25, which was not replied to by the Appellant. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9, which was also not replied to. The Adjudicating Authority granted several opportunities to the Appellant to file a reply, but the Appellant did not avail of these opportunities. The Adjudicating Authority noted that the matter had come up for hearing on several occasions. The Corporate Debtor was given many opportunities to file the reply on several occasions since beginning but the Corporate Debtor did not bother to file reply. The Adjudicating Authority
…Respondent issued a…
Counsel for the…