The 'State Bank of India' (Financial Creditor) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking initiation of the 'corporate insolvency resolution process' against ‘Priknit Retails Limited' (Corporate Debtor). The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh admitted the application via an order dated September 11, 2019. The appellant challenged this order before the Appellate Tribunal.
The 'State Bank of India' initiated a corporate insolvency resolution process against ‘Priknit Retails Limited' by filing an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority, the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, admitted the application on September 11, 2019. Vijay Kumar Ghai, the Appellant, challenged this order before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the application was barred by limitation. The Appellant also expressed willingness to settle the matter with the State Bank of India and potentially file an application under Section 12A of the I&B Code. The State Bank of India holds 91% of the voting share. The Appellant moved before the ‘State Bank of India' for 'one time
…Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh…
The matter was taken up by the National…
The 'State Bank of India' (Financial Creditor) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking initiation of the 'corporate insolvency resolution process' against ‘Priknit Retails Limited' (Corporate Debtor). The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh admitted the application via an order dated September 11, 2019. The appellant challenged this order before the Appellate Tribunal.
The 'State Bank of India' initiated a corporate insolvency resolution process against ‘Priknit Retails Limited' by filing an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority, the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, admitted the application on September 11, 2019. Vijay Kumar Ghai, the Appellant, challenged this order before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the application was barred by limitation. The Appellant also expressed willingness to settle the matter with the State Bank of India and potentially file an application under Section 12A of the I&B Code. The State Bank of India holds 91% of the voting share. The Appellant moved before the ‘State Bank of India' for 'one time
…The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh…
The matter was taken up by the National…