The appeal was filed against an order dated 01st May, 2023, passed by the Adjudicating Authority on an application preferred by the Monitoring Committee. The Appellant is a member of the consortium of the Successful Resolution Applicant and is aggrieved by the said order.
The appeal was filed against an order dated 01st May, 2023, passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
The Appellant is a member of the consortium of the Successful Resolution Applicant.
The Appellant claims that the Adjudicating Authority incorrectly recorded that all counsels agreed in unison to dispose of the application.
The Appellant argues that the directions in paragraph 12 of the order are unclear and may be misinterpreted.
The Monitoring Committee contends that the Successful Resolution Applicant has made the entire payment as per the Resolution Plan.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by the…
Monitoring Committee…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeal was filed against an order dated 01st May, 2023, passed by the Adjudicating Authority on an application preferred by the Monitoring Committee. The Appellant is a member of the consortium of the Successful Resolution Applicant and is aggrieved by the said order.
The appeal was filed against an order dated 01st May, 2023, passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
The Appellant is a member of the consortium of the Successful Resolution Applicant.
The Appellant claims that the Adjudicating Authority incorrectly recorded that all counsels agreed in unison to dispose of the application.
The Appellant argues that the directions in paragraph 12 of the order are unclear and may be misinterpreted.
The Monitoring Committee contends that the Successful Resolution Applicant has made the entire payment as per the Resolution Plan.
Order passed by the…
Monitoring Committee…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.