The case involves an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Tirupati Conductors Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant initially filed the Memo of Appeal on 2022-12-08, but the office identified defects and communicated them to the Appellant on 2022-12-09. The Memo of Appeal was returned to the Appellant on 2022-12-12. The Appellant re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2023-01-20, with a delay of 35 days.
Tirupati Conductors Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant) filed a Memo of Appeal on 2022-12-08. The office identified defects and notified the Appellant on 2022-12-09, returning the Memo of Appeal on 2022-12-12. The Appellant re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2023-01-20, incurring a delay of 35 days. The Appellant attributed the delay to the need for an affidavit concerning dim/illegible pages, the Appellant Company's location in Kolkata, the conducting counsel's winter break travel, and the closure of the counsel's office. The Interlocutory Application (IA) seeks condonation of this delay. The delay is relevant because the Appellant was required to re-file the Memo of Appeal within seven days of being notified of the defects.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Appellant, Tirupati…
The office notified the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application to extend the time granted for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Tirupati Conductors Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant initially filed the Memo of Appeal on 2022-12-08, but the office identified defects and communicated them to the Appellant on 2022-12-09. The Memo of Appeal was returned to the Appellant on 2022-12-12. The Appellant re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2023-01-20, with a delay of 35 days.
Tirupati Conductors Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant) filed a Memo of Appeal on 2022-12-08. The office identified defects and notified the Appellant on 2022-12-09, returning the Memo of Appeal on 2022-12-12. The Appellant re-filed the Memo of Appeal on 2023-01-20, incurring a delay of 35 days. The Appellant attributed the delay to the need for an affidavit concerning dim/illegible pages, the Appellant Company's location in Kolkata, the conducting counsel's winter break travel, and the closure of the counsel's office. The Interlocutory Application (IA) seeks condonation of this delay. The delay is relevant because the Appellant was required to re-file the Memo of Appeal within seven days of being notified of the defects.
The Appellant, Tirupati…
The office notified the…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.