The State Bank of India (SBI) filed a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 150 of 2024 challenging an order passed by the NCLT. SBI also filed I.A. No. 478 of 2024 seeking condonation of a delay of 18 days in filing the appeal. The NCLT order, passed in I.A. No. 127 of 2022, was related to convening a Committee of Creditors (CoC) meeting. SBI contended that the impugned order was not available until 12.12.2023, and they made an attempt to obtain a certified copy on 20.11.2023 but were informed that SBI was not a party to the I.A. and could not apply for a certified copy. Bank of Baroda, the respondent, argued that the order was pronounced in the presence of SBI's counsel on 10.11.2023, and the delay was not condonable.
1. State Bank of India (SBI) filed a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 150 of 2024 against an order passed by the NCLT.
2. SBI also filed I.A. No. 478 of 2024 seeking condonation of a delay of 18 days in filing the appeal.
3. The impugned order was passed on 10.11.2023 in I.A. No. 127 of 2022.
4. SBI claimed the impugned order was not available prior to 12.12.2023 and was uploaded on the NCLT website on 12.12.2023.
5. SBI's advocate attempted to file a precipe for a certified copy on 20.11.2023 but was informed SBI was not a party to I.A. No. 127 of 2022 and could not apply for a certified copy.
6. Bank of Baroda, the respondent, filed an affidavit stating I.A. No. 127 of 2022 was heard on 10.11.2023 in the presence of SBI's counsel, and the order was pronounced in open
Sign in to view the parties.
The NCLT passed an…
SBI's advocate attempted to file a precipe for…
The State Bank of India (SBI) filed a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 150 of 2024 challenging an order passed by the NCLT. SBI also filed I.A. No. 478 of 2024 seeking condonation of a delay of 18 days in filing the appeal. The NCLT order, passed in I.A. No. 127 of 2022, was related to convening a Committee of Creditors (CoC) meeting. SBI contended that the impugned order was not available until 12.12.2023, and they made an attempt to obtain a certified copy on 20.11.2023 but were informed that SBI was not a party to the I.A. and could not apply for a certified copy. Bank of Baroda, the respondent, argued that the order was pronounced in the presence of SBI's counsel on 10.11.2023, and the delay was not condonable.
1. State Bank of India (SBI) filed a Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 150 of 2024 against an order passed by the NCLT.
2. SBI also filed I.A. No. 478 of 2024 seeking condonation of a delay of 18 days in filing the appeal.
3. The impugned order was passed on 10.11.2023 in I.A. No. 127 of 2022.
4. SBI claimed the impugned order was not available prior to 12.12.2023 and was uploaded on the NCLT website on 12.12.2023.
5. SBI's advocate attempted to file a precipe for a certified copy on 20.11.2023 but was informed SBI was not a party to I.A. No. 127 of 2022 and could not apply for a certified copy.
6. Bank of Baroda, the respondent, filed an affidavit stating I.A. No. 127 of 2022 was heard on 10.11.2023 in the presence of SBI's counsel, and the order was pronounced in open
The NCLT passed an…
SBI's advocate attempted to file a precipe for…