Starlog Enterprises Ltd. filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai, regarding IA No.5247 of 2024. The CIRP of the corporate debtor commenced on 02.02.2024. The appellant's cranes were in the possession of the corporate debtor. Winding up proceedings against the corporate debtor commenced in 2017-18. The appellant claimed hire charges for the cranes, but the Resolution Professional did not initially respond to the claim, and only a partial claim was admitted later. The Resolution Professional did not offer to return the cranes or acknowledge the claim until 27.11.2024, when they requested the appellant to take the cranes. A joint inspection was conducted, and some cranes were taken over, but the process was
…The corporate debtor underwent CIRP starting 2024-02-02. The appellant, Starlog Enterprises Ltd., owned cranes that were in the possession of the corporate debtor. Winding up proceedings against the corporate debtor had commenced in 2017-18. Starlog Enterprises claimed unpaid hire charges for the cranes. They filed a claim with the Resolution Professional (RP) on 2024-02-16. The RP initially did not respond, and later admitted only a partial claim on 2024-07-31. The RP did not offer to return the cranes. On 2024-11-27, the RP requested the appellant to take the cranes. A joint inspection occurred, and some cranes were taken back. Starlog Enterprises filed IA No.5247 of 2024, seeking admission of a claim of Rs. 2,54,80,792 in addition to the already admitted Rs.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Winding up proceeding…
Last invoices…
Starlog Enterprises Ltd. filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai, regarding IA No.5247 of 2024. The CIRP of the corporate debtor commenced on 02.02.2024. The appellant's cranes were in the possession of the corporate debtor. Winding up proceedings against the corporate debtor commenced in 2017-18. The appellant claimed hire charges for the cranes, but the Resolution Professional did not initially respond to the claim, and only a partial claim was admitted later. The Resolution Professional did not offer to return the cranes or acknowledge the claim until 27.11.2024, when they requested the appellant to take the cranes. A joint inspection was conducted, and some cranes were taken over, but the process was
…The corporate debtor underwent CIRP starting 2024-02-02. The appellant, Starlog Enterprises Ltd., owned cranes that were in the possession of the corporate debtor. Winding up proceedings against the corporate debtor had commenced in 2017-18. Starlog Enterprises claimed unpaid hire charges for the cranes. They filed a claim with the Resolution Professional (RP) on 2024-02-16. The RP initially did not respond, and later admitted only a partial claim on 2024-07-31. The RP did not offer to return the cranes. On 2024-11-27, the RP requested the appellant to take the cranes. A joint inspection occurred, and some cranes were taken back. Starlog Enterprises filed IA No.5247 of 2024, seeking admission of a claim of Rs. 2,54,80,792 in addition to the already admitted Rs.
…Winding up proceeding…
Last invoices…