The case involves an appeal filed by the Promoters of the Corporate Debtor challenging an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority on 2024-06-12. The Adjudicating Authority had directed the Promoters/Suspended Directors to deposit Rs. 1.5 Crore in two monthly installments. The appellant claims to have informed the Resolution Professional that the Daga family has waived their rights to six flats on the 9th floor, which can be monetized by the RP for further constructions.
The Promoters of a Corporate Debtor filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority, which directed them to deposit Rs. 1.5 Crore in two monthly installments. The Promoters claim that six flats belonging to the Daga family on the 9th floor can be monetized by the Resolution Professional (RP) and that they have waived their rights to these flats. They argue that the Adjudicating Authority should have directed the RP to monetize the flats instead of ordering the deposit. The bank's no objection to the charge over the flats was not raised before the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant seeks to use the proceeds from the sale of the flats to carry out further constructions and repay liabilities.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
The matter was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal filed by the Promoters of the Corporate Debtor challenging an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority on 2024-06-12. The Adjudicating Authority had directed the Promoters/Suspended Directors to deposit Rs. 1.5 Crore in two monthly installments. The appellant claims to have informed the Resolution Professional that the Daga family has waived their rights to six flats on the 9th floor, which can be monetized by the RP for further constructions.
The Promoters of a Corporate Debtor filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority, which directed them to deposit Rs. 1.5 Crore in two monthly installments. The Promoters claim that six flats belonging to the Daga family on the 9th floor can be monetized by the Resolution Professional (RP) and that they have waived their rights to these flats. They argue that the Adjudicating Authority should have directed the RP to monetize the flats instead of ordering the deposit. The bank's no objection to the charge over the flats was not raised before the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant seeks to use the proceeds from the sale of the flats to carry out further constructions and repay liabilities.
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
The matter was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.