The case involves an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority, which rejected IA No. 2988/2023. The appellant filed IA No. 2988/2023 with several prayers, including deciding CA 1500/2019, CA 1501/2019, and IA 3089/2021 before deciding IA 5003/2021 for approval of a modified resolution plan, remanding the resolution plan for fresh consideration by the CoC, directing the RP to release the amended/correct IM, directing the RP to provide the altered Information Memorandum to the Applicants, directing the RP to provide the Applicants a seat in CoC, directing the RP to provide the Applicants with complete IA 5003/2021, and deciding all IA's and objections of Aggrieved Applicants before IA 5003/2021. The appellant also sought a forensic audit and any other order
…Shyam Kishan Saraf & Anr. filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority that rejected IA No. 2988/2023. The appellant's prayers included multiple requests related to the resolution plan, such as deciding pending CAs and IAs before considering the approval of the modified resolution plan, remanding the resolution plan for fresh consideration, directing the RP to release amended information, providing the altered Information Memorandum to the Applicants, providing the Applicants a seat in CoC, providing the Applicants with complete IA 5003/2021, deciding all IA's and objections of Aggrieved Applicants before IA 5003/2021, ordering a forensic audit, and passing any other order deemed fit. The Respondent's counsel argued that the approval of the plan
…Sign in to view the parties.
The court heard Mr. Shyam Kishan Saraf, who…
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority, which rejected IA No. 2988/2023. The appellant filed IA No. 2988/2023 with several prayers, including deciding CA 1500/2019, CA 1501/2019, and IA 3089/2021 before deciding IA 5003/2021 for approval of a modified resolution plan, remanding the resolution plan for fresh consideration by the CoC, directing the RP to release the amended/correct IM, directing the RP to provide the altered Information Memorandum to the Applicants, directing the RP to provide the Applicants a seat in CoC, directing the RP to provide the Applicants with complete IA 5003/2021, and deciding all IA's and objections of Aggrieved Applicants before IA 5003/2021. The appellant also sought a forensic audit and any other order
…Shyam Kishan Saraf & Anr. filed an appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority that rejected IA No. 2988/2023. The appellant's prayers included multiple requests related to the resolution plan, such as deciding pending CAs and IAs before considering the approval of the modified resolution plan, remanding the resolution plan for fresh consideration, directing the RP to release amended information, providing the altered Information Memorandum to the Applicants, providing the Applicants a seat in CoC, providing the Applicants with complete IA 5003/2021, deciding all IA's and objections of Aggrieved Applicants before IA 5003/2021, ordering a forensic audit, and passing any other order deemed fit. The Respondent's counsel argued that the approval of the plan
…The court heard Mr. Shyam Kishan Saraf, who…
The Adjudicating Authority passed an order…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.