The case involves an appeal against two orders dated 2023-06-26 and 2023-06-30. The Adjudicating Authority had taken the reply on record and reserved the order after hearing the matter on 2023-06-26. The Appellant filed I.A. No. 2722 of 2023 to set aside the order dated 2023-06-26, which was rejected on 2023-06-30. The Corporate Debtor has filed a Reply and written submission. The appellant requested an adjournment on 2023-06-26, which was not granted.
Shreya Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against LIC Housing Finance Ltd. The appeal contested two orders issued on 2023-06-26 and 2023-06-30 by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority had reserved its order after taking the reply on record. The appellant's application (I.A. No. 2722 of 2023) to set aside the order of 2023-06-26 was rejected on 2023-06-30. The Corporate Debtor filed a reply and written submission. The appellant's request for adjournment on 2023-06-26 was denied. The appellant argued for another opportunity for final argument, which was not possible due to the unavailability of counsel. The court considered the submissions and record. The Adjudicating Authority's order was already reserved, and the request to set it aside was
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority took the reply on…
The Appellant requested…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal against two orders dated 2023-06-26 and 2023-06-30. The Adjudicating Authority had taken the reply on record and reserved the order after hearing the matter on 2023-06-26. The Appellant filed I.A. No. 2722 of 2023 to set aside the order dated 2023-06-26, which was rejected on 2023-06-30. The Corporate Debtor has filed a Reply and written submission. The appellant requested an adjournment on 2023-06-26, which was not granted.
Shreya Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal against LIC Housing Finance Ltd. The appeal contested two orders issued on 2023-06-26 and 2023-06-30 by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority had reserved its order after taking the reply on record. The appellant's application (I.A. No. 2722 of 2023) to set aside the order of 2023-06-26 was rejected on 2023-06-30. The Corporate Debtor filed a reply and written submission. The appellant's request for adjournment on 2023-06-26 was denied. The appellant argued for another opportunity for final argument, which was not possible due to the unavailability of counsel. The court considered the submissions and record. The Adjudicating Authority's order was already reserved, and the request to set it aside was
…The Adjudicating Authority took the reply on…
The Appellant requested…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.