Macquarie Bank Ltd. initiated applications under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which were admitted by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi. The orders were challenged before the Appellate Tribunal, which set them aside. Macquarie Bank Ltd. then appealed to the Supreme Court, which remitted the appeals. The Resolution Professional filed a petition for clarification on computing the 180-day resolution process period.
Macquarie Bank Ltd. initiated insolvency proceedings against Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority admitted these applications. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. appealed to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which initially set aside the Adjudicating Authority's orders. Macquarie Bank Ltd. then appealed to the Supreme Court, which remitted the matter back to the NCLAT. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. argued that the agreement between the parties was governed by English law and that no amount was due. The appeals were filed by the Corporate Debtor through its suspended Board of Directors. The Supreme Court had previously ruled on the maintainability of such appeals in
…Sign in to view the parties.
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law…
Appellate Tribunal set…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
Macquarie Bank Ltd. initiated applications under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which were admitted by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi. The orders were challenged before the Appellate Tribunal, which set them aside. Macquarie Bank Ltd. then appealed to the Supreme Court, which remitted the appeals. The Resolution Professional filed a petition for clarification on computing the 180-day resolution process period.
Macquarie Bank Ltd. initiated insolvency proceedings against Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority admitted these applications. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. appealed to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which initially set aside the Adjudicating Authority's orders. Macquarie Bank Ltd. then appealed to the Supreme Court, which remitted the matter back to the NCLAT. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. argued that the agreement between the parties was governed by English law and that no amount was due. The appeals were filed by the Corporate Debtor through its suspended Board of Directors. The Supreme Court had previously ruled on the maintainability of such appeals in
…Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law…
Appellate Tribunal set…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.