This appeal was filed by Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi after the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench) appointed Mr. Anurag Goel as a ‘Resolution Professional’ instead of Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi. The Adjudicating Authority's decision was based on the fact that Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi had already been appointed as 'Resolution Professional' in another case. The appellant argues that the ‘Operational Creditor’ proposed his name as the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’ and that the Adjudicating Authority can only reject the proposal if there are disciplinary proceedings pending against him.
Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi filed an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench) which appointed Mr. Anurag Goel as a ‘Resolution Professional’ instead of him. The Adjudicating Authority's decision was based on the fact that Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi had already been appointed as 'Resolution Professional' in another case. The ‘Operational Creditor’ proposed Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi's name as the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’. The appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority can only reject the proposal if there are disciplinary proceedings pending against him. The court noted that Mr. Anurag Goel had been appointed as ‘Resolution Professional’ and the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) had approved
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law…
Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
This appeal was filed by Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi after the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench) appointed Mr. Anurag Goel as a ‘Resolution Professional’ instead of Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi. The Adjudicating Authority's decision was based on the fact that Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi had already been appointed as 'Resolution Professional' in another case. The appellant argues that the ‘Operational Creditor’ proposed his name as the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’ and that the Adjudicating Authority can only reject the proposal if there are disciplinary proceedings pending against him.
Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi filed an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench) which appointed Mr. Anurag Goel as a ‘Resolution Professional’ instead of him. The Adjudicating Authority's decision was based on the fact that Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi had already been appointed as 'Resolution Professional' in another case. The ‘Operational Creditor’ proposed Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi's name as the ‘Interim Resolution Professional’. The appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority can only reject the proposal if there are disciplinary proceedings pending against him. The court noted that Mr. Anurag Goel had been appointed as ‘Resolution Professional’ and the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) had approved
…The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law…
Sharvan Kumar Vishnoi…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.