The case is an appeal under Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 944 of 2019 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi. The appellant is Shankar Ganapathy, and the respondents are K. R. Sundaresan & Ors. The appellant's counsel has been repeatedly absent, including on multiple prior dates.
The appellant, Shankar Ganapathy, filed an appeal (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 944 of 2019) before the NCLAT. The respondents are K. R. Sundaresan & Ors. The appellant's counsel failed to appear on multiple occasions, including 22.10.2019, 11.12.2019, 09.01.2020, and 10.01.2020, despite repeated calls. The respondent's counsel, Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, was present. Due to the appellant's repeated absence, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal and vacated the interim order.
Sign in to view the parties.
Counsel fo…
Counsel fo…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case is an appeal under Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 944 of 2019 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi. The appellant is Shankar Ganapathy, and the respondents are K. R. Sundaresan & Ors. The appellant's counsel has been repeatedly absent, including on multiple prior dates.
The appellant, Shankar Ganapathy, filed an appeal (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 944 of 2019) before the NCLAT. The respondents are K. R. Sundaresan & Ors. The appellant's counsel failed to appear on multiple occasions, including 22.10.2019, 11.12.2019, 09.01.2020, and 10.01.2020, despite repeated calls. The respondent's counsel, Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, was present. Due to the appellant's repeated absence, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal and vacated the interim order.
Counsel fo…
Counsel fo…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.