Seya Industries Ltd. filed an appeal against Central Bank of India challenging an order dated 18.10.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Mumbai). The appellant claimed they received the notice of the appeal on 26.10.2023, making it impossible to appear on the same day. The Central Bank of India disputed this, stating the notice was served in March 2023. The appellant also argued that the petition was 2059 pages long, and the time allowed for reply (until 30.10.2023) was insufficient. The NCLT, Mumbai, was scheduled to be closed from 11.11.2023 to 19.11.2023, re-opening on 20.11.2023. The relevance of these facts lies in the appellant's claim of insufficient notice and time to respond to the appeal, as well as the operational schedule of the NCLT.

Seya Industries Ltd. filed an appeal against Central Bank of India challenging an order dated 18.10.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Mumbai). The appellant claimed they received the notice of the appeal on 26.10.2023, making it impossible to appear on the same day. The Central Bank of India disputed this, stating the notice was served in March 2023. The appellant also argued that the petition was 2059 pages long, and the time allowed for reply (until 30.10.2023) was insufficient. The NCLT, Mumbai, was scheduled to be closed from 11.11.2023 to 19.11.2023, re-opening on 20.11.2023. The relevance of these facts lies in the appellant's claim of insufficient notice and time to respond to the appeal, as well as the operational schedule of the NCLT.