The case involves a Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.100/2024 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties arrived at a 'Mutual Settlement Agreement'. The appeal arises from an Impugned Order dated 16.02.2024 passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'Tribunal' in CP(IB) No.18/BB/2023 on the file of the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'National Company Law Tribunal', Bengaluru Bench.
Sanjay Raj is the Appellant. G K Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. are the Respondents. During the pendency of Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.100/2024, the parties arrived at a mutual settlement agreement. This settlement is evidenced by a 'Joint Memo', Settlement vide Page 11 of the IA No.311/2024. The Impugned Order dated 16.02.2024 was passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'Tribunal' in CP(IB) No.18/BB/2023. The '2nd Respondent' / 'IRP' is permitted to file appropriate / necessary Interlocutory Application, before the ‘Adjudicating Authority' / ‘Tribunal', to lay a claim in respect of CIRP costs and expenses against it before the 'Adjudicating Authority' / ‘Tribunal'.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating…
The NCLAT passed an…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.100/2024 before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties arrived at a 'Mutual Settlement Agreement'. The appeal arises from an Impugned Order dated 16.02.2024 passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'Tribunal' in CP(IB) No.18/BB/2023 on the file of the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'National Company Law Tribunal', Bengaluru Bench.
Sanjay Raj is the Appellant. G K Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. are the Respondents. During the pendency of Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.100/2024, the parties arrived at a mutual settlement agreement. This settlement is evidenced by a 'Joint Memo', Settlement vide Page 11 of the IA No.311/2024. The Impugned Order dated 16.02.2024 was passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority' / 'Tribunal' in CP(IB) No.18/BB/2023. The '2nd Respondent' / 'IRP' is permitted to file appropriate / necessary Interlocutory Application, before the ‘Adjudicating Authority' / ‘Tribunal', to lay a claim in respect of CIRP costs and expenses against it before the 'Adjudicating Authority' / ‘Tribunal'.
The Adjudicating…
The NCLAT passed an…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.