The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellant's counsel appeared and, after being heard for some time, submitted instructions to withdraw the appeal, intending to take advantage of liberty granted by the Adjudicating Authority.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma filed an appeal against Corporate Power Ltd. before the NCLAT. On February 19, 2020, the appellant's counsel appeared but did not mark attendance. The counsel submitted that he had instructions to withdraw the appeal, intending to take advantage of liberty granted by the Adjudicating Authority. Consequently, the NCLAT disposed of the appeal as withdrawn without liberty to challenge the same impugned order. The key fact is the voluntary withdrawal of the appeal by the appellant.
Sign in to view the parties.
The learned counsel for the Appellant is heard…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellant's counsel appeared and, after being heard for some time, submitted instructions to withdraw the appeal, intending to take advantage of liberty granted by the Adjudicating Authority.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma filed an appeal against Corporate Power Ltd. before the NCLAT. On February 19, 2020, the appellant's counsel appeared but did not mark attendance. The counsel submitted that he had instructions to withdraw the appeal, intending to take advantage of liberty granted by the Adjudicating Authority. Consequently, the NCLAT disposed of the appeal as withdrawn without liberty to challenge the same impugned order. The key fact is the voluntary withdrawal of the appeal by the appellant.
The learned counsel for the Appellant is heard…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.